A
Digital Communicator uses a telephone line to communicate with the
Central Station. It can distinguish between different alarm signals
such as intruder or personal attack. If the system is to provide for
automatic police response it should have a dedicated phone line and
it should send 'open' and 'close' signals to reduce the chance of
false alarms being policed. Accordingly, each time the system is set
or unset you pay for a telephone call. Some companies use a premium
rate number but even at the standard rate the cost can mount up. Key
holder only response avoids these additional calls and costs. In many
police areas an alarm system which brings police response and which
is installed in commercial premises must be 'silent' at the premises
for ten minutes in order to give the police a chance to attend before
the intruder is scared away. With some types of premises the burglar
would acheive his objective and be long gone in five minutes.
Systems
with police response are subject to that response being withdrawn if
false alarms persist. As a measure to reduce the number of false
alarms the system can only be reset by an engineer or remotely by the
central station if the reason for the activation can be satisfactorly
explained and system is configured to do so. Engineer resets can be
very costly, paticularly in the early hours of the morning. A
standard digital communicator cannot signal if the line is cut.
RedCare
Monitoring
RedCare
monitoring is operated by BT in conjunction with a central station
and acts in a similar way to standard monitoring (Central
Station Monitoring) The
main difference from a security viewpoint is that a 'no response'
signal will be transmitted to the central station if the line is cut.
RedCare is more costly but there are no call charges for alarm data
communication and the line can also be used for speech only (not fax
or modem) calls and alarm signals can be transmitted even when the
line is busy. Accordingy, RedCare offers a higher level of security
than standard monitoring.
RedCare
GSM Monitoring
RedCare
GSM monitoring is increasingly specified by insurers in order to
provide alarm verification (see below). It consists of RedCare as
above with the addition of GSM. If the line is cut a 'no response'
signal is sent. If this is followed by the detection of an intruder,
an 'alarm' signal is sent via the GSM Network.
Alarm
Verification
Alarm
verification works in conjunction with monitored systems and is now
an APCO reuirement for policed systems. It comes in several forms:
Sequential
Verification
This,
the simplest method confirms that more than one detection device has
operated in more than one part of the premises. The drawback is that
if an intruder enters say through an office window, grabs a computer
and exits the same way, the intrusion might not well be verified and
not therefore policed. Keyholders would however, still be notified.
Audible
Verification
Microphones
are installed at straegic points and in the event of an alarm
activation the central station operator can 'listen in'. There can be
problems if there is a high ambient noise level which can either make
listening in difficult or which could be lead to wrong interpretations.
Visual
Verification
C.C.T.V.
cameras (often fitted within the detectors) are used to send still
frames of the 'activation' to the central station in order to verify
the prescense of an intruder. Conventional CCTV cameras can also be
used in which case the operator can 'tour' the premises and keep
intruders on screen and feed the infomation of their wherabouts to
the police or security gaurds.
DD
243 (systems with Police Response)
DD
423 is the latest standard applicable to systems with police
response in the drive towards false alarm reduction. Before any
system qualifies for police response a URN (unique reference number)
has to be applied for and issued by the relevant police force. If the
URN for any existing system is withdrawn, any application for
response to be re-instated will be treated the same as a new application.
For
new applications to be considered, the system must be DD423
compliant so losing your URN through false alarms could prove costly
as you could be looking at a new system.
There
are many changes to system design and configuration but perhaps the
most obvious is that the conventional method of unsetting your system
by means of entering your code into a key pad is no longer acceptable
where full verification is required. Access gained through the normal
entry door, must disable verifaction using this method and this might
not be acceptable to your insurers. The alternative is to use a high
security key lock or electronic key such as a key fob or proximity
device. However, depending on the method chosen, you might lose the
ability to check which keyholder has gained access when checking in
the event log.
It
is your insurers who decide what cover they will offer in
conjunction with which type of alarm system but at the same time, the
system must operate within the rules laid down for the police to
issue a URN and accordingly, for police response to be applicable.
Security
'Smoke' Systems
An
extremely effective means of reducing theft from within a building is
to use security smoke devices. If an intruder activates the alarm
and subsequently activates a detector within the area(s) protected by
a smoke machine or machines, smoke will be emitted which quickly
fills the area and reduces visibility to zero. What you can't see,
you can't steal.
The
'smoke' is similar to the type used on the stage and is completely
harmless and will not cause any damage to stock or equipment.
Up-load,
Down-Load Systems
Many
systems now incorporate text display for interrogation of the system (Systems
with Text Display). Up-load,
down-load systems allow an engineer to interrogate alarm systems
from a remote computer using security codes. This means that faults
can be diagnosed and system settings changed, for example to remove a
suspect non-essential detector from the system to overcome problems
to allow the system to remain in use until a site visit can be made.
Large
companies with their own security departments can be provided with
print outs showing activity at premises where suspicions have been
roused including access with date and times of specific keyholders
without staff at the particular branch even being aware. In the event
of an intrusion, the log can be checked in the same way to verify the
stated version of events.
Approvals
& Standards
Until
a few years ago, each Police Force issued a list of 'recognised'
Alarm Companies but this system has now been scrapped. The
Association of Chief Police Officers have introduced a uniform policy
primarily aimed at Intruder Alarms which involve a direct Police
response and as a part of this policy, only companies 'Approved' by
one of the ACPO recognised inspectorates can become involved with
such systems. As a spin off to this, the Police advice regarding the
installation of domestic alarm systems is now to use a company which
has gained such approval. However, there is no statutory requirement
for a company installing 'audibles only' systems to gain such
approval, it is purely on a voluntary basis. In order to gain
approval, an alarm company must show that they are keeping proper
records, they must provide 24hr emergency service and they must work
to and carry out all the requirements of BS 4737 / PD6662 and any
other standards relevant to specific installations. Additionally,
they are open to regular inspection and vetting and must bear the
additional costs involved.
Owl
Alarms is inspected and approved by the new SSAIB which
has been re-formed to include the original SSAIB, Integrity 2000 and
the AISC.
NSI
(NACOSS)
NACOSS
is an inspectorate/approval body. Because NACOSS (formerly the
NSCIA) was the original body, 'NACOSS registered company' is often
used when all that is meant is 'approved company'. When the system
was changed other inspectorates/approval bodies were formed and
recognised by ACPO in order to prevent a monopoly from developing
futher. As a result of the merger of three inspectorates mentioned
above, the new SSAIB now has more approved companies than NACOSS.
However, NACOSS have the national's and generally larger companies on
their books and in this sector, the number of companies is
diminishing due to an alarming number of buy-outs.
Gardtec
800/500 Series
The
GARDTEC 800/500 Series Control panel must rank as one of the most
reliable ever produced while at the same time being very simple to
operate. The new 'Contour' key pad is small and very attractive with
a flap which covers the buttons but which allows you to check the
status of your system even when the flap is closed. Its simplicity
lies in the English Text Display which asks questions for you to
answer 'Yes' or 'No'. For example, if you enter the Master Code the
display will show:

To
fully set the system, push 'Yes'.
or:
To
night set the system push '1' for silent part set.
To
un-set the system, simply enter your code.
And
that is all you need to know for everyday use, it just couldn't be simpler!
However,
you can do a lot more if you so choose and because of the 'Yes / No'
you can do it without referring to an instruction book. The system
puts you in full control. It 'logs' all events with the date and time
including switching on & re-entering the premises plus any alarm
activations with the source of the alarm. You can also add and delete
user codes at will. So if for example, you are going on holidays and
you are leaving your house keys with a neighbour, you can simply add
in the code of their choice so they will remember it without writing
it down. You can configure that code to automatically start the set
procedure as soon as it is entered so they cannot interfere with any
settings. On your return, you can delete that code without even
remembering it. You can check the log to see if they have been in and
how often and for how long. If there has been an activation in your
absence, you can check to see if it is 'user error' or a genuine
activation. Because the source of the alarm is identified for the
engineer, any faults can be simply located and rectified so you can
have complete confidence in your system and above all, peace of mind.
These
are the user functions that can be accessed with the Master Code:
Do
you want to SET the System? - Do you want to REMOVE Zones? - Do you
want to TEST the System? - Do you want to VIEW the Log? - Do you want
to Change Chime? - Do you want to Prog USER CODES? - Do you want to
set DATE/TIME? Enter your code and simply push 'No' until you reach
the function you want and then push 'Yes' and follow the on-screen instructions.
These
functions are standard on the basic 800 control panel. A range of
panels is avaiable with even more functions and features. For
commercial premises, the Gardtec 872 will provide up to 144 zones.
Domestic
Systems - Designed for Security or Profitability?
People
have alarms fitted to their homes in order to deter thieves and to
minimise damage and loss. An alarm system with a bell box from a
recognisable security company does deter. If however, a thief is not
deterred and enters the property, the alarm sounding will invariably
send him packing. Why risk confrontation when he can move on to a
softer target? How often do you read that 'the intruder fled when he
activated the alrm system'?
It
follows therefore, that the alarm must sound outside the premises in
order to attract the attention of neighbours and others if it is to
have the desired effect. Where Central Station Monitoring is employed
for domestic dwellings, it should compliment this, it cannot
realistically replace it.
There
is a disturbing trend for householders to be sold monitored alarm
systems (often by NACCOS approved companies) which do not incorporate
outside alarms, just empty decoy boxes (which incidentally, does not
compromise compliance with BS 4737 provided the correct type of
internal sounder is fitted). These systems are usually sold with a
monthly monitoring and maintenance payment and the theory is that you
dont need an outside alarm because the system is monitored and
the police will be called.
The
drawback is that burglars can be in and gone with your valuables in
less than five minutes, before the police can generally respond. The
ACPO (police) policy for intruder alarms recognises this problem in
that the previous requirement by many forces for a ten minute bell
delay at private dwellings was scrapped. It is also worth remembering
that if the system suffers with false alarms for whatever reason,
police response can be withdrawn.
Villains
are quick to learn and they will soon discover which companies rely
on solely monitoring and do not fit active outside alarm boxes and
thus the deterrent effect of any these systems will be diminished.
Such
systems are often offered for a low outlay or even free,
(you just pay monthly monitoring and maintenance with a minimum
contract of perhaps three years) often by large companies as a means
of attaining sales.
The
question is, why should these companies choose not to specify an
outside alarm? What if police response has been withdrawn? They
appear to recognise the deterrent factor because they fit a decoy
box, (or is that just for advertising purposes?). The only logical
answer seems to be that the customer who has been making monthly
payments for three years or more could well think they have paid
enough and decide to terminate the contract. As the system would then
cease to be monitored, without an outside alarm it would be of little use.
Perhaps
the most important deterrent to these companies is the means to
deter their customer from terminating their contract!